News, apparently, to some people who have never paid attention to coal mines (not news to the miners who don't count because they're not doctors or reporters):
from the Times Online
Boogity boogity magic BOOM and all of a sudden, there was an earthquake and the sea rushed in and filled the area with sediment, and perfectly preserved 10,000 hectares of forest by fossilization. To call that a bit of a stretch is an understatement.
They are ignoring a more plausible theorem because it doesn't fit into the humanist/evolutionist worldview.
Try this: before the Flood, the trees (and everything else) had a much broader range of the earth to grow on, because the global environment was healthier (maybe I'll talk about this in another post, later). So there was a forest in this place. Then the world was inundated, and this forest was covered with silt, and fossilized. Makes sense to someone not unwilling to believe what the Bible says is true. If the Bible can't be true, you come up with a whole forest subsumed in an earthquake and yet still standing, due -since this is the current bogeyman- to global warming.
Not.
Once again, science agrees with the Bible, if you will look at it from the proper perspective.
However, since the "experts" say different and nobody currently alive was there to see what happened to this forest, we will never know, and both sides will likely continue to believe what they did before, except for the soft-headed who will be persuaded due to the "experts" having Said So.
Of course, to present both theories in school for children to consider, would be a Bad Thing, right? I mean, right?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment