Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Fitghting the Good Fight

Iraq was bad.  Iraq was Bush's war.  The just war was Afghanistan because Bin Laden was there.  Now that he's dead there will be no more terrorism and we have pulled all our troops out of Afghanistan.  Oh, wait. . . .

Make that, Secretary of State Clinton tries to get Algeria to help us invade frikken MALI in the global war on not-specifically-islam-or-something. Great.

hat tip: Instapundit

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Does This Qualify as "Smart Diplomacy?"

"How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction?" -Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Madame Secretary, this is a clue-bat. Our ambassador took your hit for you. Count yourself fortunate, although I fear he took the clue with him to his reward. They aren't grateful to you for your halfassed filibustering. They hate you. This is what you get for removing their impulse-suppressing strongman dictator.

Romney was right. It was because of weakness. Excuse me please for having listened to the open-mic candid audio recording of the reporters planning in advance how they could badger him for saying it, and how they would spin his responses against him. No bias there.

"We came, we saw, he died! LOL!" -Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Heckuva job, Hillary. You should be proud of how you established a democratic peace over there in Libya and Egypt.

********

For those who missed it, an act of war was committed the other day. Well, ANOTHER act of war. But the United States as a nation has decided to totally overlook the fact that we are currently engaged in fourth-generation welfare against islamists who obey the Sunnah.

Hint: you can't have legitimate victory until AFTER you have named -and beaten- an enemy.

Sunday, July 15, 2012

Smart Diplomacy, That's What It Is.

Pure genius. Let's send a white woman to a muslim "democracy" to speak on our behalf. Sure, they might respect her . . . and they might just pelt her car with shoes and tomatoes.

Friday, December 10, 2010

No Conflict of Interest At ALL!

President Clinton has paid President Obama a visit for council on this tax policy mess. That would be the tax policy mess Obama got himself into by being an intransigent ivory tower leftist in the face of both public opinion and political reality. If the Dear President weren't such a babe in the woods, he would know to beware.

President Clinton is married to Secretary of State Clinton, who (as we know because she ran last time) has serious ambitions to be President, and is not getting any younger. If President Obama can be publicly made out to all and sundry as not the one who should be President next term, he may face a primary challenge from Mrs. Clinton. History lesson: incumbent Presidents in living memory do not survive primary challenges.

If Clinton can give bad enough advice that Obama can screw the country worse than he was already going to, Hillary will be the front-runner for the Democrat nomination for PotUS in 2012. Barry is a FOOL to listen to anything Bill Clinton has to say.

********

But then, he's also doing a pretty convincing imitation of a fool in most other respects, so . . . .

Friday, August 20, 2010

Quote of the Day 08/20/2010

"The President will hold bilateral meetings with the four leaders" -Hillary Clinton

Your Secretary of State, the brilliant oratrix. One supposes she meant to say "a conference" or at least "multilateral meetings" but the above is what she did say.

Friday, June 18, 2010

Clinton Announces Lawsuit Against AZ Law

. . . on ECUADORAN television. The US Secretary of State announced a HUGE DEAL lawsuit against a State which made a law because the Feds wouldn't enforce the matching national law, on a foreign national television interview. Have you heard about it anywhere but talk radio and the blogosphere?

Depending on which judge they shop this case out to, this could be a real humm-dinger, and it will certainly end up before he Supremes. If they decide the wrong way, it will be regarded in future years as one of the key incidents leading to the balkanization of the formerly-United States.

We'll see.

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Make That TWO Unreasonable Refusals of Help

"I cannot say why they have not accepted the offer. That is a question for the US State Department."

So says the anonymous spokeswoman for the UK's Department of Energy and Climate Change. Was she talking about the Obama administration's refusal of Dutch ships equipped with oil skimming equipment on day 3 after the accident? No, she was referring to the fact that we turned down an offer of HALF of the UK's stockpiles of oil dispersant chemicals at their cost price.

So, Hillary, What do you say? Nothing. Alright then.

********

That is now representatives of two foreign nations who were trying to help deal with what was obviously an international disaster, days before the President of the USA had said public word #1 on the subject.

Friday, May 21, 2010

Bumbling Toward Korean War II

There are right and wrong ways to approach a madman with his finger on the button. Having a woman with no clue how to be a Senior Statesman -especially the woman who made it possible for Korea to become a nuclear state to begin with- talk about "serious consequences" is probably not the way. Citing undeniable proof when there is only circumstantial evidence is also not the way.

I hope to continue to believe that the people running America right now are just bumblers and generally incompetent. I can't see Hillary Clinton getting us in a war over one foreign Navy's ship being sunk, but she probably wouldn't even see it coming until we were knee-deep in (sh)it. Then again, her husband did paint our warplanes blue and bomb the heck out of Yugoslavia, so . . .

********

. . . still waiting on the war crimes indictment against him on that one, BTW.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Hillary To Let Russia Examine Our Nukes.

Am I wrong to jump straight to the phallic jokes? Okay, I'll skip it; you can come up with those all by yourself anyhow.

What's the worst that could happen? I mean, we are all totally best-buds with Russia now, so why not let them in to all of our nuclear installations to locate, count, and draw "XOXO love you long time" on all our nuclear weapons?

There is not enough snark in the world to denigrate the weapons-grade stupidity our Secretary of State is showing off here. The President is weak and apparently State is stuck on kindergarten-playtime rules of situational ethics. I said it before, and I reiterate: don't be surprised at anything that happens after a Socialist is elected to President in the United States of America.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Obedience To Your National Constitution = Coup now. Good to Know!

What media bias?

The Washington Post repeatedly calls the legitimate actions taken by the Supreme Court and military of Honduras "a coup."

At least give them credit for a passing reference to the complete left-leaning bungling of this affair on the part of the U.S. State department: we have committed "a violation of the first law of diplomacy"

Compare the tenor of that Washington Post article with this one from The Weekly Standard, and tell me these two reporters are not playing from opposing ends of the field.

Bonus points to The Weekly Standard for excellent use of the word defenestration.

Monday, December 15, 2008

Clinton & Obama are The SAME!

Hillary Rodham Clinton is about to go into a high public office with the prospect of a legal/Constitutional crisis over her head. She has not served even one term in a national elected post and is now 100% ready to abandon that post and leave her elected office for the Governor of New York to fill via appointment. Presumably the voters that elected her will understand that a greater good is at stake (her political advancement).

Barack Hussein Obama is about to go into a high public office with the prospect of a legal/Constitutional crisis over his head. He has not served even one term in a national elected post and is now 100% ready to abandon that post and leave his elected office for the Governor of Illinois to fill via appointment. Presumably the voters that elected him will understand that a greater good is at stake (his political advancement).

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

No Respect, No Respect Atall!*

That would be from the Democrats, for the Constitution.

I had heard rumblings about this a week or two ago when Hillary was nominated to Secretary of State. Now it has actually hit the mainstream news media so I may as well mention it even though they are likely to get one over on you anyhow.

Step 1) The U.S. Constitution prohibits a Senator from being appointed to a civil office, if the civil office got a pay raise during the time they were serving as a Senator.

Step 2) The civil office post of the Secretary of State got a pay raise while Hillary Clinton was a Senator.

Step 3) Therefore, she is barred from serving as Secretary of State. Seems simple, right?

Hold on there.

To the Democrat party, the Constitution is a "living, breathing document" which means basically if they need it changed to suit their ends, by golly it's getting changed. So now there is a serious attempt to

(wait for it)

CIRCUMVENT THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE BENEFIT OF A SINGLE PERSON

They literally are trying to make an end-run around the freakin' Constitution for the United States of America! What makes this shameful spectacle even worse is that the person for whom they are trying to subvert the supreme law of the Land is sitting in one of the houses of Congress that will be voting on this measure. She will be voting on her own behalf to try to bend the constitution just a little bit, just this once

I would just like to take this opportunity to thank the fools idiots City dwellers citizens of New York for electing this carpetbagging [deleted] to the Senate. Good job there, you jerks!

********

For those who did better than the average bear subjected to government school "education" here is the pertinent part of the Constitution. Hair-splitters may note that this is NOT an amendment, but it was in the main body before they passed it around to the States for ratification. Article 1, Section 6 says:

"No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office."


There are more things prohibited in that section than I laid out in Step 1) above, as you can clearly see. This Section prevents shenanigans like empire and dynasty building. How? Let's say some civil office is created during the term of a Congressman, with power to do all sorts of nasty things like take over the country, when you read the fine print of the laws laying out the office's authority. Then the Congressman whose idea it was, gets himself appointed to the new office, and starts running things. Bad, right? Right, that's why the founders of our nation (who were, generally speaking, each smarter than all current members of both houses of congress put together) put it in the first Article of the Constitution.

********

*The title of this post should be read with the voice of Milton in Office Space. If you have never seen Office Space, you need to buy it now, and watch it. Failure to do so will result in your missing half the jokes told by everyone who has ever seen Office Space.

Friday, November 21, 2008

Hillary Clinton to Be Secretary of State

Not only do we have another woman secretary of state (3rd world read: weak, dumb, ineffectual, no need to take seriously), we have one who is a socialist. Great.

Well, I guess that's a change.

But then, so is being kicked in the 'nads. Just sayin'.

One can hardly help noticing that this acceptance comes, what, a day or 2 after the Secretary of Health and Human Services position was filled. . .

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Yep, I Was Right.

. . . I DO have something disparaging to say about the running mate pick.



Folks, there is a REASON why BIDEN isn't the Candidate, and the Candidate apparently forgot about that when he picked someone 'with experience'. I suppose Obmaminitly thought it was a compliment to be referred to as a Black Man who is "articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy" . . . I thought it was insulting and derogatory, as well as racist, myself but Offenses can only be taken, right? Or maybe the "white" half of Obama agreed with Biden about his "black" half. I dunno. But ANYways:

So, Captain Hopey Changey, a NEW kind of politician, Looking for Change (tm), chose as his running mate...

A 35-year veteran of The Way Things Have Always Been. Of course, if you were really paying attention, you would know that Barry Obama is actually a lightweight emptysuit big city machine politician, and the change he really wants is the kind that gets us closer to killing people for speaking against The State the government that the other politician who had a cult of personality liked.

With apologies to the artist for not properly linking to the comic strip:


You know what would really make Hillary the Smartest Woman In America? If this 'symbolic vote' between her and Barack [Redacted] Obama (you know: racism vs. sexism as the Democrat Choice) was the final move in a masterfully played chess game. She deceived the nation into thinking Obama was the one, got him to pick a running mate that would finally sink him with the Youth Vote and then She's the Nominee and she's been spared MONTHS of SCATHING (read: true) coverage in the right-wing (read: objective) media. Not that it would help, because she almost comes pre-fisked out of the box, but still... if someone is not paying attention enough to vote Hillary in a primary, maybe the shiny bauble Obama's campaign will have kept them from paying attention to her, and they'll still Love her.

Yikes.

Remember to Vote, people. At least you can cancel out somebody else's vote for a genuine Socialist.

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Hillary Is Worse Than A Liar.

So, when she said she was under sniper fire, running to cover in Bosnia, she was actually standing, smiling on a tarmac, receiving gifts from a little girl. That's not a lie. That's making stuff up, for you to buy into without asking any inconvenient questions.

Now it comes out (from a first-hand source no less), when she was 27, she was fired for unethical conduct and couldn't get a letter of recommendation. She hid evidence of a sitting president's right to council of an attorney, then wrote a brief to the effect that he didn't have the right to council. Too bad for the nation, Nixon resigned. If he hadn't, and she had submitted the brief, she would have been disbarred and we might not be in the current pickle. That, by the way, is making stuff up, for you to buy into without even the opportunity to find out the inconvenient truth.

Remember: for a Socialist, the State is the highest good. If it is good for the state (as Hillary of course would be (in her own mind anyway)) then it is good, regardless of truth or morality.

That is all.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Jimmy Carter Sucks.

In 1977 U.S. President Jimuh Carter banned the recycling of commercial nuclear reactor fuel. India had nipped some from a neighbor and made a Bomb with it, and he didn't want that to happen to US reactor fuel. So he made it against the law to recycle the stuff. By the law of unintended consequences, he put containment pools in a hundred or so places in the country, holding deadly radioactive waste under water.

Ok, fine. So what?

So nobody steals radioactive waste in the country that is (arguably) one of the most anal about storage and security of it. Come on, now.

In france, something like 80% of their energy comes from nuclear power plants. Do they have these deadly dangerous containment pools? Not so much. In france they

recycle it.

something like 95% of spent fuel rods are material that can be reprocessed and put right back into a nuclear reactor. The rest is mostly isotopes of lead, cesium and strontium. Cesium and strontium have half-lives of less than 40 years, each. They are reduced to mostly harmless in relatively short order. The uranium and plutonium are what needs to be locked away for thousands and thousands of years. You know, that same uranium and plutonium which is able to be reprocessed into useful reactor fuel? Yeah, that stuff. You end up with a choice: recycle it and protect the citizenry from a little bit of crazy dangerous stuff for a few hundred years, OR don't recycle and protect the citizenry for longer than we have had recorded human civilization on this planet. Hmm.

Does it make the choice any harder when I tell you that France stores all of their Cesium and Strontium waste in Le Havre. . . in a SINGLE FRIKKEN ROOM?

Barack Hussein Obama is against Yucca Mountain. So is Hillary Rodham Clinton. So am I. Because this is about the stupidest idea EVAR! Could you imagine what would happen if somebody in government proposed that we take all the used aluminum cans in the country and bury them underground in the middle of nowhere instead of recycling them? Do you think environmentalists would go for it?

Oh, you can hear it already, nuclear fuel is dangerous! Three Mile Island! Chernobyl! Mutated fish in the streams!

HOG

WASH

!

Anybody that says nuclear energy is dangerous is either a) stupid b) not paying attention c) too lazy to do 5 minutes of research online d) lieing or e) somebody with commercial interests in keeping the status quo. Allow me to make a controversial statement:

Nuclear energy is safe, environmentally friendly and nonpolluting. It is a natural process brought under control and NOT a threat to the people or environment of the U.S.A., and we should be doing more of it.

I could write a book about this topic, but it's already been done and the idiots and jerks in government don't seem to care, so I won't waste the effort. If your interest is piqued, please visit this website for more information.

Friday, February 29, 2008

Mandatory Preschool / Day Care

So it's not enough that Hillary wants to force you at gunpoint to buy health care "insurance" from Uncle, even though you are a millionaire who is healthy as a horse.

No, she also wants to force you to put your kid in a day (don't) care center. Let's not kid ourselves here. We're not talking about pre-kindergarten, we're talking about babysitting. A 4 year old who has spent the first 3 years in day-care is going to be about as functional as a home-kept (actually day (do) care) 2 year old.

Yes every kid is different. My 4 year old is reading and my 5 year old is reading at about 2nd grade. I'm sure your snowflake is a genious as well. But I have also seen day-care centers in action, first-hand. I have heard reports of 3 year-olds in diapers in walkers, unable to speak. And we're going to put these kids in school? No, friends, pre-k for average 4 year-olds is day-care. 4 year-olds are barely kept in control by *some* parents. How do you expect some "teacher" to get a whole classroom full of babies to behave for classes all day? Not.

Nevermind all the stories of kids neglected to the point of serious injury and death. How many times have you heard about a kid left in the day-care bus and forgotten, broiled alive in the summer sun? My personal favorite was a kid left outside on the playground. Not even a toddler, a very baby. On the blacktop. In the summer. Without skin on hands and knees after crawling on the boiling-hot macadam, screaming in pain, unheard by the jerks inside who neglected to get a head-count after recess. Yeah, let my kids at 'em. Sure, your "learning center" is different. Right. Try to at least act like you care when you hear about the next kid killed or seriously injured by not-parents, when one of the parents could have foregone some "stuff" and stayed home for a few years.

Yes, yes, some people have circumstances that require the kid to be in day-care. Most don't and I'm not even going to argue with you about it. About 90% of the families with babies in day-care just want to unload the little screamers and keep working so they can have a bigger plasma TV or that next vacation. I can hear them whining already and it falls on deaf ears.

YOU can care for your children better than a day-care center can. If you had a choice, would you rather spend YOUR first 4 years with Mommy, Nanny, or Day-care worker?

THEN WHY THE **** ARE YOUR KIDS IN DAY-CARE! You only get one shot at rearing them and you're opting out. It's only a few years of sacrifice, get over yourself already.

Hillary's a communist folks. Or a socialist (even the communists have trouble keeping their name stright). She thinks your children belong to the government, or else she wouldn't have the audacity to call for them to be cared for by someone other than you.

If her "mandatory" 4 pre-k is the same kind of "mandatory" as her health care, I'm going to say it looks like she wants to steal your children from you. My wife is happy at home, training our children to be Good People. We'd rather not show them the other uses of bananas until they are old enough to understand what the banana represents, thanks. We'll teach them about having 2 mommies when they can understand that it's not the way to be 'normal'. We'll also keep them several years ahead of their peers by training them at home, or in a private school, instead of a government indoctrination center.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Re: The Photo of Obama the Evil Black African Muslim:

So Barack Hussein Obabma went to Africa and dressed like an African. So did Both Bushes and at least one notable Clinton and IIRC a Reagan. When in Rome. Everybody is saying it's an attempt at a smear from Hillary's campaign, playing the race and mooslim cards.

Hold on there.

It seems to me that this could be a net positive for Obama. He gets sympathies from people who can actually think about the context of the photo. Also, and more importantly, he has people buzzing about a non-issue. This of course means that nobody is buzzing about the more substantial reasons to be unhappy about Obama as a potential presidential candidate.

Sure somebody in the Clinton camp probably dug this up and tossed it out. Maybe even she didn't know about it in advance. I'm just saying, if we never find out who and why exactly the image came out, it could as easily be from the Obama campaign.

Just sayin', that's all.