President Obama sounded(as Ingraham said) Commander-in-Chiefy at times during his speechifying about Libya last night.
Some people might say that he boldly, boldly! did bubkis until Hillary had NATO start interfering in Libya's civil war. Any right-thinking person will notice that the
excuses reasons they say we are in Libya would apply equally-well to various other nations, but we continue not to go blast heck out of those nations. The question is: Why?
Are we involved because Italy et. al. have a vested interest in Libyan oil? (I thought wars for oil was bad?)
Did Jacques Chirac lose a big poker game to Qaddafi?
Did Qaddafi insult Mr. Soetero and Obama is getting payback for his daddy's sake?
Is Hillary setting Obama up for a fall in 2012?
WTF WHY are we in Libya?
And don't say humanitarian anything, and don't say we're doing violence to prevent violence. Don't say we're not in it for regime change because we have definitely taken sides and made position statements indicating we are AGAINST the incumbent dictator. Whose side are we on? The Libyan people? Then why are we fostering war in their nation? Who is their leader if not Qaddafi? SRSLY Clinton is meeting with the rebels? And she thinks they're going to tell her the truth?
*sigh* Babes in the woods, that's what they are. And the woods are dark and deep (but not lovely).
No comments:
Post a Comment