So, is this the change you were hoping for?
Cliff's: The who voted for the following jack-holes in Congress make me ashamed to have them in my country: Ms. Sanchez, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Yarmuth, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Bishop, Mr. Braley, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Hare, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Clay, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Davis, Mr. Courtney, and Mr. Kirk. They are the sponsor or co-sponsors of H. R. 1966 the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act. This act is both evil and unconstitutional.
Also it makes the above listed persons feeeeeeel as if they have done something to fix a problem they know [deleted] about.
If this act were to pass, and you got your panties in a twist over something you see via"email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, [or] text messages," then you can try to get somebody "fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
That is to say, if your speech is unpopular, it is banned. Hello? I know these people were probably government-educated, but can you all at least contact your congresscritters and tell them to put the crack pipe down before they submit legislation?
Repeat after me: "The First Amendment is there to protect unpopular speech."
Friday, May 8, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment